Summer Catch-Up
(Newer movies that
I’m just getting to now)
Twerking in a Malick movie? It's a whole new world |
Another year another Terrence Malick picture. Oddly though they aren’t blending together in
my mind. Somehow I can remember the
basic deals with all of them. But this latest
one is more distorted and really hard to love.
Song to Song deals
with three main players. Michael Fassbender
(Blood Creek) is a slimy asshole music
producer, Ryan Gosling (The Nice Guys)
is an up and coming musician and Rooney Mara (The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo) is a woman who’s very into sex/part
time musician. Ok here’s the best I can
tell what happened. Michael and Rooney
were fucking but not bf gf, Rooney then shacks up with Ryan but the three of
them are good friends and like going places together, Michael then marries
Natalie Portman (Goya’s Ghosts) even
though she always looks uncomfortable to be around him, Ryan cheats on Rooney
with LLykke Li (music shit), Rooney and Ryan break up, Rooney dates Berenice
Marlohe (Skyfall), Ryan dates Cate
Blanchett (Indiana Jones and the Kingdom
of the Crystal Skull), Natalie Portman dies (I think), Rooney and Ryan
eventually get back together. Phew.
Malick tries mixing it up a little this time but the results
aren’t great. He introduces more story
than he has since The New World (The Tree of Life had more ideas (space
porn, dinosaurs, afterlife?) but not necessarily more story). I think Rooney is supposed to be a sex addict
but she has trouble finding pleasure in it lately. Ryan and Michael are friends but they have a
falling out when Michael copyrights Ryan’s songs in his own name. Michael and Natalie’s relationship never seems
right because Michael is a controlling cheating dick. When Rooney and Ryan split up they both then
date someone totally different. Rooney
dates a woman and Ryan dates an older woman (11 years older) who his mother
doesn’t approve of. It’s kinda too much
story.
Any one of the above plotlines would’ve been enough for a
movie by itself. The problem is Malick introduces
something else he hasn’t done in a while, scenes with actual dialogue. Well maybe scenes should be in quotations
because his crazy editing style has finally become a liability. If you’re going to attempt “scenes” with
dialogue and this much story and chop the whole thing up like a madman then it’s
gonna be even harder than usual to follow what the fuck is going on. You’ll get part of a “scene”, maybe the
beginning, middle or end, and then we’re suddenly off to look at other shit or
jump to someone else’s storyline. The pacing
becomes awkward and I felt like more stuff was getting by me than normal
because all I have to go on are these snippets.
So the actors are going to say more than they have in the
previous bunch of Malick films because we have the aforementioned dialogue but
we also still have his customary soft spoken voice overs. And what makes this particularly difficult is
everyone had to make up their own lines on the spot (apparently like Knight of Cups there was no script) so
almost all delivery comes off unnatural as hell. Gosling especially feels out of place. He’s a funny guy in his movies that says
cheeky cutesy shit. Malick doesn’t do
that. He definitely does playful but
playful actions, not words. Everything
Gosling says sounds like it’s from another film.
All of the characters are one dimensional too due to there
being not enough time to devote to each of them. Things are hinted at but nothing really
develops. Supposedly the original cut
was eight goddamn hours long which I suppose would’ve told us more about these
people but who knows? And boy I wouldn’t
wanna be the one to conduct that experiment.
The celebrity cameos were distracting as well. All of these love stories are trying to be woven
together and then bam it’s The Red Hot Chili Peppers or Patti Smith or Iggy
Pop. Not that I was so into this one to
begin with but that didn’t help get me involved. Val Kilmer was cool to see for a minute
though. He plays a performer that’s
supposed to be about stage gimmicks like cutting an amp in half with a chainsaw
‘n shit. I think that was my favorite
part of the picture.
Of course cinematographer Emmanuel Lubezki (The Birdcage, Birdman) makes this look gorgeous
as per usual. He and Malick always knew
how to beautifully capture natural landscapes but with Knight of Cups and now this one they’ve mastered how to make even
mundane urban environments look like the prettiest shit you’ve ever seen.
Alright one more thing.
The editing is off. Yes it’s
frantic like normal but the selection is odd at times. Typically quick random shots are inserted in
these movies but in the past they appeared to make some sort of sense in the
overall scheme of things. Here the
chosen random shots are sometimes just too damn random. It’s like the editing is on autopilot and the
computer is choosing from whatever’s available with no rhyme or reason.
I know you’re thinking “what did you expect from that weirdo
recluse director?” Well I guess you got
me there. Malick’s style is starting to
wear out its welcome a bit. I can
appreciate on one hand that he attempted to take a very tiny baby step towards making
what we would all consider a conventional narrative film, but at the same time
that baby step is not a good mixture of elements that really works. The stilted unscripted dialogue, the flat
characters, the overabundance of storylines, the over editing even by Malick
standards and etc, it doesn’t come together.
It’s a youthful picture though. Youthful in that Malick went for younger
lovers, somewhat more progressive themes, more modern music, hell there’s even
shots of folks moshing. I mean there
still isn’t very much modern technology in sight like cell phones, computers,
etc but I can’t blame the guy for wanting to explore a newer world. And I certainly can’t blame him for making
whatever the fuck movie he wants in whatever the fuck style he wants. On that level he’s still very inspiring. This time unfortunately it didn’t work out. It’s possibly his worst one but hey, I’m still
sticking with the guy. Let’s see where
he goes from here.
No comments:
Post a Comment