If you still had doubts that Scott Adkins (The Debt Collector) is the reigning champ of action cinema right now take a gander at One Shot and then get back to me. Holy shit what a fun and exciting film.
At first I was worried because the beginning has a cheap
amateur feel. The setup of Navy SEALS
and a CIA operative butting heads with other secretive US government spooks to
transfer a terrorist prisoner isn’t particularly interesting. It’s generic military crap that a zillion other
movies use as a baseline for tension. However,
when a large force of insurgents armed to the teeth breaks into the compound it’s
all out war. They want the prisoner in
question and it’s up to Adkins and co. to prevent that from happening by both
fighting the enemy head on in firefights, sneaking around covertly dispatching
victims and desperately trying to get the antenna up and running again so they
can call for backup.
The main gimmick of this sucker is that it all appears to be
done in one long shot. It wasn’t but it
becomes so engrossing it doesn’t matter (plus these motherfuckers ain’t crazy
like those who made Russian Ark).
The closest equivalent that I (and I think most people) have seen is 1917,
a seemingly single take war picture. One
Shot is sort of like a much rougher version. The camera doesn’t glide nearly as elegantly so
you definitely notice the movements more.
This is particularly obvious in the non-action scenes where the
filmmakers don’t know what to do with the camera so they end up swiveling in a
circle around the actors or swinging back and forth between whoever has the
next line of dialogue. They never lock
the camera down. For three quarters of
the film this works though because there’s so much chaos with constant scrapes
and shouting matches that you do get successfully emersed in the dire situation. The rawness and limitation of committing to a
one shot approach works incredibly well here.
And with the combination of a continuous shot and little relief
from the onslaught certain deaths hit hard.
Most are your usual stormtrooper type with faceless guys being gunned or
knifed down and you don’t really think about it. But there are a couple of non-military administrative
folks that work at the black site who get executed and it’s kinda disturbing. And earlier one of Adkins’ team lies severely
injured on a table after the initial attack slowly dying with his brothers in
arms unable to help him. They can only
do their best to comfort him during his last moments. The camera doesn’t cut away because it can’t making
this scene especially heart wrenching.
This is a smartly made film.
They knew to keep the location in one contained area (a secret US black
site somewhere), the scenario is simple (protect the prisoner), they plotted out
the action and non-action scenes well so there would be proper breaks, good people
were hired to pull this shit off and there’s a clever twist towards the end. It’s just so impressive what these guys were
able to accomplish on a tiny ass budget (compared to a major Hollywood flick).
You do have to accept certain views the movie throws at you however. There’s an acknowledgment that these black
sites are, maybe not good, but at least necessary. The title has a double meaning beyond the
technical standpoint that this target prisoner is our one shot at preventing a possible
imminent terrorist attack on DC. If he
dies potentially hundreds or thousands of innocent people will as well. Even though the movie makes an argument against
torturing people for information the water gets muddied when whoops! That’s a spoiler. Look, I’d be lying if I said this ruined the
film for me. The rest of what’s
presented is so enjoyable that I was able to compartmentalize this stuff.
Definitely not for everyone.
But if it sounds like it’s in your wheelhouse take the plunge, it’s exhilarating.
No comments:
Post a Comment