The initial botched op to kill Angela is partly due to the
villain’s incompetence but even more so with Angela’s amazing luck. And this continues to be the case throughout
the picture. When it appears the bad
guys are closing in they always fuck it up and/or Angela gets exactly what she
needs to escape the situation. For
example Angela is riding in a car with an FBI agent and she’s getting him up to
speed on what’s been happening. During
the conversation the agent slips up unintentionally revealing he’s a
baddie. Angela picks up on this right
away, grabs the wheel causing the car to crash into another bad guy’s car purely by accident and then runs from the
wreck uninjured. She jumps over a draw
bridge conveniently separating so neither bad guy in their banged up car can
pursue her. She gets away completely
unscathed. I know it sucks that this
lady had her life taken away but at the same time shit like this constantly
rolls her way.
As improbable as a lot of the stuff in the movie tends to be
the hardest to swallow is probably the specific set of circumstances that needs
to occur for the story to play out. So first
of all the bad guy must attain a certain 3.5 inch floppy disk that’s in Angela’s
possession because it has the powerful software on it. But once the dude retrieves it (after
pretending to fight off a hired mugger) he doesn’t kill Angela on the spot. Instead this scumbag decides to ride the wave
of phony heroism and has sex with her first, seriously.
There’s also this blind faith that everyone has towards
computers in this film. They don’t think
beyond what the screen tells them which helps the villains get away with more
than they probably should. The broad
message the filmmakers are laying out is that our entire existence is so
wrapped up in computer data, networks and everything being interconnected that if
one thing goes wrong or if someone decides to mess with our info then we’re all
fucked. It’s a cautionary tale
proclaiming that what happens to Angela could happen to any one of us.
Now, I’m sure you’re all eager for me to point out how
poorly the computer technology is represented here but after this last viewing
I honestly don’t know how off it is. The
movie was actually ahead of its time on ordering food and booking an airline online
and with how prevalent online record keeping would become. And pretty much everything that’s
accomplished with computers in this is because government institutions are
buying what they think is legit software but really it grants the bad guys access
to their system. So by abusing this
power the villains aren’t hacking exactly and that’s an interesting workaround
to make the computer shit seem more plausible.
The technology showcased however is dated as hell. This is where we as a society almost twenty five years later can sit back and laugh. I already mentioned 3.5 inch floppy disks, but there are also giant CRT computer monitors, chat rooms, car phones and etc. It’s all funny to see now. But this shit became dated in only a few short years after the film’s release. The title itself, referring to an early nickname for the internet, didn’t last long in our vocabulary either.
Before I wrap up I wanna point out how the movie plays both
into and attempts to subvert computer nerd stereotypes of the time. On one hand Angela is socially awkward,
hasn’t had many intimate relationships, is a hermit who locks herself in her
house and in her free time doles out her fantasy of the perfect man to
strangers in a chat room. On the other
hand it seems the filmmakers didn’t want Sandra Bullock to physically look like
the epitome of a nerd. She doesn’t wear
thick glasses or frumpy or grungy clothing or have a wacky hair color or
anything like that. In fact they sex her
up by having her lounge on a beach in a bikini, wear only a towel while watching
the news after a shower and giving her several outfits that show off her
midriff. It feels exploitative and kinda
gross the way the filmmakers approached that.
So anyway, how does this shit measure up? Well surprisingly some of the ideas in here
are still relevant like identity theft and assault from viruses and hackers with
malicious intent. That’s a real ongoing
problem that can have serious consequences.
I think it’s much more difficult to wipe someone completely off the digital
map than the movie makes it out to be though.
There are too many backups, redundancies and good old paperwork for that
to occur overnight.
The thriller aspect of the picture is the dumber part
actually and has a very trashy dime store novel feel. Angela outwits and out-lucks the bad guys
over and over to a comical point. She
should’ve been dead within the first fifteen minutes.
At the time it was a hit doing well at the box office. And there was enough interest in the concept that a TV show (1998) and a DTV sequel, The Net 2.0 (2006), got made. Although the sequel apparently dumps the Angela Bennett character for someone new.
I still enjoy watching this one but that’s out of nostalgia
more than anything else. It does stay
focused on the main plot with almost no sidetracking so that’s nice. I don’t know if I can really recommend it in
good faith though. These techno
thrillers have a short shelf life which makes them harder to appreciate as time
goes on and this is no exception.
No comments:
Post a Comment