I didn’t expect anything from this one because no one ever
talks about it. I figured it was so bad
that people just don’t even want to bring it up. Well I was pleasantly surprised. I really dug this version and now I’m
confused why it’s never referenced.
Let’s start with the good.
The production design is pretty incredible. Dr. Seward’s hospital is a little messy, a
little creepy and a little overrun with patients; the ships are dingy, the days
are constantly overcast, the period costumes look great and the nifty car that
Harker drives is kinda cool. But
definitely the pièce de résistance is Carfax Abbey. It stands in for Dracula’s castle and man
does that set look tremendous. The space
is huge with gothic sculptures, chandeliers everywhere and a sweeping
staircase. The outside looks fucking eerie
as well.
The cast gives good performances including Donald Pleasance
(Halloweens) as Dr. Seward, Kate
Nelligan (Wolf) as Lucy, Laurence
Olivier (Rebecca) as Van Helsing and
Frank Langella (The Ninth Gate,
Frost/Nixon) as Drac. I’ll get into
Olivier and Langella more specifically in a minute.
The scene where Van Helsing stakes Mina through the heart is
done really well. The makeup in
particular on Mina is pretty spooky. And
the special effects aren’t bad. I
especially like when Dracula climbs up and down walls. It looks convincing. And there’s this one part where he jumps
through a window and instantly becomes a wolf that was awesome.
It’s shot pretty damn well too with John Badham
directing. This is what he did after Saturday Night Fever. The cinematography was done by Gilbert Taylor
who was DP on Hitchcock’s Frenzy, The
Omen and fucking Star Wars. The score was penned by John Williams also. So this was kind of an epic production.
There are a couple of bad points though. The first is going to sound odd but bear with
me. Langella’s hair is very
distracting. It’s really 70’s and it’s
too big. The length and poofiness keeps
changing too making it incredibly difficult to ignore. Other than his hair Langella is a fucking bad
ass Dracula. I’ll admit I had my doubts
but once you see him next to others he’s a tall, slender man dressed practically
all in black that has an imposing presence.
Just his very stature and calm but assertive voice demands your
attention. I mean the man’s a good six
to eight inches taller than anyone else in the film and that was smart casting. Langella has a special talent of looking relatively
normal while radiating this very off feeling. But Jesus that hair. I don’t know what they
were thinking.
So overall more positives than negatives. Langella wanted to portray Dracula as “…a
nobleman, an elegant man with a very difficult problem” and I think he achieved
that. We don’t get any bloody fangs or
gory violence. This version is more
play-like similar to the ’31 Dracula. And I’m not sure which one I like
better. I want to say this one but it
doesn’t have the journey to Dracula’s castle segment that carries so much
weight with me. However, I do very much
like the look and feel of the ’79 version.
It strikes a good balance between the horror and romantic aspects of the
story. Good job movie.
Creep factor: Some but not a lot. Carfax Abbey is fantastic, Dracula himself
and the vampire Mina scene are all good stuff.
Romance factor: Pretty high.
After Bela Lugosi’s infamous performance Dracula had become caricatured
pretty quickly and everyone just thought of him as a monster. This film attempts to show a more humanized version
than what you’ve seen before.
did no one else notice that he turned into a kite, at the end?
ReplyDeleteOh, I suppose he does.
Delete