What I liked: Ghostface is the most threatening he’s
ever been. His victims don’t get in as
many blows when they tangle and he doesn’t clumsily knock into shit as much.
Towards the end when the remaining characters are running
and hiding from the killer one guy gets spooked when Ghostface pops out from
behind a door and he exclaims “holy shit, it’s Ghostface!”Well, yea ha, I mean who else would it be?Maybe the funniest joke in the whole series.
Awww yea they bring back the Broken Arrow guitar cue
from part 2 when Dewey decides to get off his ass and help out in the
investigation.
What I Didn’t Like: Almost everything else.
Overall Impressions: Look guys, this part 5 wore me
down a touch.I’m struggling to find
stuff to talk about because this series in general doesn’t give you a ton to
analyze and this installment might be the worst offender.Nothing new is added here.Ghostface picks off Woodsboro residents one
at a time using his trusty knife, he makes menacing phone calls, a group of
high school friends along with a cop (or ex-cop in this case) and a reporter work
together to solve who’s behind it all, the opening mirrors the original with a
high school girl getting harassed on the phone alone at home, one major
character dies off, the finale takes place during/after a party, everyone’s a
suspect, Ghostface gets knocked out for a moment but nobody disarms him or
pulls the mask back, they trot out long time vets Sidney (Neve Campbell (House
of Cards)), Gale (Courteney Cox (Cougar Town)) and Dewey (David
Arquette (Bone Tomahawk)) to come save the day, Ghostface’s victim
selection and motive don’t make any sense, etc.
I plan on diving into this a little more in the wrap up but
yet more relatives of characters from the first film are introduced.This is all the Screams ever do.None of the sequels are daring enough to find
a way to do their own thing while staying true to the spirit of the
original.This has to be possible, no?
And similar to part 3 they go too damn meta.This one almost borders on satire with the
characters repeatedly commenting on the type of movie they’re in.On one hand they openly suspect one another
of being the killer but then on the other they continue to hang out, flirt and party
with each other.You can’t have it both
ways.“I don’t know that you’re not
Ghostface…you wanna make out?”
What I Liked:I’m kicking this right off with a
spoiler. Skip to the next paragraph to
be in the clear. The multiple
openings idea is terrific. Having a
movie within a movie within a movie sounds like a horrible mess (and a similar
idea they already explored in part 3) but it turns out to be a lot of fun with
genuine surprise, well done trickery and smart execution. Unfortunately the rest of the film does not
continue in this fashion. Imagine if
they just kept doing intros all in distinct and increasingly inventive
ways. Sort of like Too Many Cooks
but feature length. Admittedly that
sounds way easier said than done though.
And while it would’ve been a drastic departure from the rest of the
series at least it wouldn’t have been yet another rehash.
Ghostface is a little bit less of a klutz in this one.I mean he still falls through a glass door
and down stairs ‘n’ shit but there isn’t as much cartoony chase crap.
Along with my point above the killings hit a touch harder
because Ghostface feels the most threatening since the first film.For one death in particular he returns to
horrifically gutting the victim like he did to some back in the original.I’m actually not a huge gore guy but this
harsh method certainly makes an impact.
What I Didn’t Like: My biggest complaint is it’s
simply more of the same whodunit shit you’ve seen before.
All the meta horror movie references step right up to the
line and think long and hard about crossing it.There’s a lot of talk about reboots and how we’re living in a new era
where all the usual horror movie rules you think you know don’t apply, anything
goes, chaos reigns, etc.First of all I
wish they weren’t quite so self-referential.But secondly for all the boasting about breaking rules, aside from the neat
opening, it’s all fairly standard stuff you’ve come to expect from a neo-slasher
picture like this.
Part of the killer’s deal is supposed to be that they’re
filming their own murders so they can upload them to the internet but they
never follow through on this.The videos
aren’t uploaded and we only see them explicitly filming one unsuccessful
attempted slaying.We then find out
there’s a camera inside the Ghostface mask to record POV but we never see that
footage or cut to that angle during the movie.It’s just weird because they make a big deal out of it like that’s the
motive behind the killings but that doesn’t turn out to be the case at all.
Overall Impressions: I wanna say they were going for a
maybe sorta back to basics legacy sequel except the other installments also stuck
pretty close to home so I dunno.Whatever,
not too interesting.It’s probably the
best sequel so far eking out part 2 but that’s not saying much.While the identity of the killer is a good
deal dumber it’s what happens after the reveal that pushes this one ahead.Speaking of which…
Spoilers for the rest of this.
You still with me?Ok.Turns out Sidney’s (Neve
Campbell (When Will I Be Loved)) niece, Jill (Emma Roberts (The
Blackcoat’s Daughter)), is behind it all (the second blood relative serial
killer in the fam if you’re keeping score (remember part 3?)).When she finishes dispatching everyone within
ten feet of her (including Sidney) she proceeds to inflict wounds on herself so
everyone else will cross her off the suspects list and get away with the
murders.And she throws herself into her
work, literally. She uses a victim’s
hand to scratch her face and tear her hair out, she runs into a glass framed
painting on the wall and finally dives backwards into a glass table shattering
the thing to bits.This drew giggles and
then chuckles out of me.
But it doesn’t stop there.Jill’s taken to the hospital and learns that Sidney is still alive and
in the ICU.Oh no!Her plan could be foiled at any moment!So she drags herself out of bed, limps down
the hall and jumps on a sleeping Sidney choking her.The two proceed to have a knock down drag out
fight right there in the hospital room.Man
is it hilarious and fantastic.These two
should be on death’s door, especially Sidney yet they go at it like a couple of
young scrappers.Then Dewey runs in and Jill
knocks him around too!And for the
record I don’t buy for a second that tiny 5 foot Jill can pull any of this shit
off.Anyway, all of it is goddamn funny
and made the experience worthwhile.
What I Liked: Sidney (Neve Campbell (54)) and
her father attempt to disappear from the world after the events of the previous
films by moving out to the middle of nowhere and changing their names. It doesn’t end up working (through no fault
of their own) but at least they tried to put the killing, deception, trauma,
etc. behind them and start over.
One homicide involves an entire house exploding into total
scraps. It looks nice and is the most
ostentatious death to date.Man, they do
a huge full fucking frame fireball in all its glory just to knock off one dude
in a Rube Goldberg-esque fashion.It’s
stupid as hell but the blast is very satisfying.
What I Didn’t Like: It’s all kinda bad so I’ll harp
on the aspect that annoyed me the most.It’s too meta.They finally
pushed this shit too far and took a sledgehammer to the fourth wall.The plot centers around the making of the
film Stab 3 (what happened to Stab 2?) so now we have a movie
within a movie and characters sharing names and familiar locations and such.The absolute worst part of the franchise (so
far) is the shoehorned Jamie Kennedy (Romeo + Juliet) cameo as Randy
Meeks.He recorded a video message
sometime before getting his throat slashed in the previous film stating that he
must be dead if you’re watching it.He
goes on to predict there will be another chapter to the Woodsboro murders and
then proceeds to explain the rules of a part 3 and trilogies in general.And all the shit he brings up eventually
happens.He avoids specifics but it’s
still too much of a tip of the ol’ hand and a hard ass wink to the audience.
Overall Impressions: Ok, this is a dumb fuckin’
movie.It doesn’t pretend that hard to
be existing in the real world anymore.First
off there was a conscious effort to make this one more humorous (more on why
later).Just about all the characters
except Sidney crack a joke every other line.Whether it’s commenting on horror movie cliches, taking shots at
Hollywood, actors being stereotypically egotistical or slinging straight up
puns, I did not find the majority of it to be very funny.
Second, there’s the updated voice changer Ghostface uses.It’s a magical device that can alter anyone’s
voice to sound like literally anyone else’s.So throughout the film when a character gets a phone call and it sounds
like Sidney or Dewey it’s really the killer.And I mean it’s a dead on replica.Nevermind the killer needs to convincingly employ the right word choice
and speech patterns to truly be effective.Worse yet is the overreliance on this fuckin’ gadget to move characters
around and drive shit forward.
Third, Ghostface teleports around just as, if not more,
easily here which is kind of a problem considering how many killers there end
up being this time.Plus he’s got a
dozen knives in his arsenal including one scene where he throws a blade at
Dewey and then, presto!, pulls out another one from inside his sleeve like a
magician.
Fourth, they detrimentally retcon the backstory of the first film.I won’t spoil it but this decision
feels extremely contrived as an excuse for a juicy twist ending.And what they came up with is a pretty lazy
piling on instead of offering an alternative explanation of events in previous
installments.So everything we know is
actually true, however, there are more people behind it and there’s more to the
conspiracy than we initially knew.
Everyone supposedly loathed Courteney Cox's bangs in this one
The big reason why part 3 is a minor disaster is they were
writing it as they were shooting.Usually when you make shit up as you go nothing makes sense and this is
proof of that.Writer for part 1 and 2
Kevin Williamson was busy working on other projects so they hired Ehren Kruger (Arlington Road, Top Gun: Maverick) who did what he could but ultimately wasn’t up to
the task.Craven and others stepped in
during production to take over resulting in the goop in front of you.
It also didn’t help that in the wake of the Columbine school
shooting the producers mandated the violence be reduced including gruesome
close ups, gore and blood.That along
with a significant bump up in humor was thought to mitigate offense to the
public at the time.That’s the reason
why this one comes across sorta different, almost like a sitcom half the time.The movie still did amazing numbers at the
box office though so these choices worked out.
What I Liked: Famously Drew Barrymore dies in the
opening of the first movie as most likely a nod to Psycho. Dispatching your biggest name star right at
the top tends to throw the audience for a loop.
They continue that trend here by knocking off several well established actors
in the first act who would certainly have stuck around longer in any other
horror picture. Not only that but they
also kill some of the survivors from the previous film signaling to you that no
one is safe.
Ok this is a weird one but Dewey’s (David Arquette (part
time wrestler)) theme music is the same as Broken Arrow the year before.It’s that twangy heavily reverbed guitar that
sounds like it’s straight out of a western.It was supposed to be temp music but they ended up leaving it in.Marco Beltrami did write a theme for Dewey
only for it to be ignored by the producers.
What I Didn’t Like: Uninteresting plot.We follow Sidney (Neve Campbell (Titanic:
Blood and Steel)) and the leftovers from the first picture wander around a
college campus while Ghostface does his thang.So more of the same.Nothing new
is done with the characters or the story.This could’ve been a result of the script being leaked during production
forcing major rewrites.We’ll never
really know how that film would’ve turned out but from what I gather it wasn’t
a significant departure from the established formula and may have even been
worse.It seems the biggest problem they
had was changing around who the original killer was supposed to be and removing
some extra plot twists.
The meta stuff doesn’t work very well here.They double down on it too by having the
events in the first film turned into a movie called Stab.All we see is the opening (directed by Robert
Rodriguez (cool!)) that’s a recreation of the original only they purposely make
it sillier by sexing and cheesing it up.We’re getting a little too into the franchise’s own head with this in my
opinion. And instead of horror movie
references they do sequel references this time because this is the sequel, get
it?I’ll admit that’s kinda clever but
it comes across more like a homework assignment than the zealous showcase of horror
fandom of its precursor.
Ghostface is even more of a klutz than the first time.For example when he’s chasing Sidney around
her house he plows into an armchair like a charging bull knocking it, the side
table and a lamp over.He looks like
such a fuckin’ goof.Why couldn’t he push
the chair out of the way or something?Why does he have to crash into it and flip over?While that got a good laugh out of me I don’t
think these moments are supposed to be funny.The other crap like the sequel talk and Jamie Kennedy’s (Three Kings)
impressions are the comedy bits.I
believe whenever Ghostface is on screen shit’s supposed to be serious.
Overall Impressions: This is a much blander version
of its predecessor and more like what that film probably should’ve been if the
stars hadn’t aligned.
What they establish with this installment is there’s a new
killer (or killers) wreaking havoc and Ghostface didn’t turn into a
supernatural entity.This means the
mystery starts all over again.That’s
fine however, expectations need to be tempered.Turning at least one of your main characters into a serial killer each
time is kind of ridiculous.It’s not
like anyone can just flip and all of a sudden they’re a blood thirsty psychotic
but that’s what these movies are laying out.
I don’t really know what else to say about this one because
it’s sorta boring.The picture rhymes to
a degree with the first and that’s tricky to do well.Most of the time it’ll be an obvious rehash
which is the case here.I’m disappointed
the filmmakers played it safe instead of taking a risk with a new direction.
What I Liked: Holy shit that opening. They tap into a basic fear of being harassed
while home alone. Your personal space is
being penetrated at first by a foreboding voice, then direct threats, then
traumatic imagery and finally the fear manifests itself as a fucker in black
shrouds and a spooky mask wielding a knife. You could just watch that, turn it off and be
satisfied. It’s perfectly paced, shot
and edited. It plays more like a short
film of its own not only because a well known star (Drew Barrymore (Firestarter))
gets bumped off in the first thirteen minutes in the spirit of Psycho (using
When a Stranger Calls as an on-ramp) but also because there isn’t much
of a link to the rest of the film (more on that when we get to the wrap up down
the road).
Big shoutout to screenwriter Kevin Williamson who put
together a very nice script.What’s really
clever about the film isn’t necessarily all the meta shit and horror movie
references but that they mess with the slasher formula.And it’s not a total reinvention.They move just enough pieces around to make
the experience fresh.The opening feels like
it should be in the middle of the film or the finale.We don’t know this person or her boyfriend
but because of the way we’re bluntly thrown into a hostile situation it seems
like we should’ve had a connection to these characters from earlier in the
story.They also have the villain, Ghostface,
attack our protagonist, Sidney (Neve Campbell (The Lion King II: Simba’s
Pride)), very early on which typically wouldn’t occur until past the
halfway point.And Sidney’s boyfriend
(Skeet Ulrich (Chill Factor)) is a suspicious character almost from the
beginning where they wag him in front of your face for so long that you’re not
sure what to believe in terms of him being a suspect.And the list goes on, like the unusually high
number of survivors by the end, who deals the death blow, Ghostface runs and
lunges and shit instead of the steady walk we’ve come to expect from a slasher
villain, etc.All risky moves that
could’ve blown up in the film’s face but instead they work wonderfully.
The plot moves at a brisk pace due to a lean script.They don’t fuck around with too much bullshit
to drag the movie down.Deputy Dewey’s (David
Arquette (Roadracers)) flirting with ruthless reporter Gale (Courteney
Cox (3000 Miles to Graceland)) is probably the one area that they
could’ve cut back on but what’s there isn’t that bad.
Ghostface’s phone voice (Roger Jackson (tons of video game
shit)) isn’t distorted or processed in a weird way.Basically it sounds like a regular guy
speaking in an aggressive tone and I dig that because it grounds the movie a
bit and makes it creepier.No bizarre
squeals, snorts or other throat noises.And even though we find out the bad guy uses a voice changer to cover up
their natural tone the device produces only a subtle effect.The filmmakers resisted going over the top on
this detail and was yet another smart decision that subverts what you expect
from a picture like this.
What I Didn’t Like: Ghostface comes across as sorta
incompetent for the entre middle portion where he’s constantly being knocked
down by Sidney and others.This guy
takes hard ass falls too. Almost on the
level of wrestlers suplex-ing each other around.If it wasn’t for the absolutely brutal
guttings he dishes out he wouldn’t feel all that menacing.I wish they didn’t make him quite so spaz-y.
I don’t totally get why Ghostface kills anyone besides his
target, Sidney.Maybe it’s to throw the
cops off the track?One death in
particular in the middle definitely seems like they simply needed a victim at
that beat instead of any logical reason.(And after a quick look up turns out that’s exactly what happened.)
It’s slightly unfortunate the score is fairly boring.The one thing missing from the complete package
is Ghostface doesn’t have an instantly recognizable or even passable music
theme.
A minor gripe but the Freddy Kreuger reference with the
school janitor (who according to the internet is Wes Craven’s cameo although
he’s completely unrecognizable) is like 1.5 secs long but ridiculously
distracting.They totally could’ve
dialed that back by having the trademark striped sweater be less vibrant or
they could’ve possibly taken away the fedora.But when he shows up it’s like a flashing neon sign saying “Do you
recognize this!!!”
Overall Impressions: Remarkably all the tweaks and
comments on the slasher formula work without being cloying.What helps is everything mentioned are time
tested masterpieces.I think the newest
film referenced is Silence of the Lambs which was only five years old
when this came out but that was already stamped a masterwork in its own time. The next newest is A Nightmare on Elm Street I think which was twelve years old at the time.So all the horror movie talk is timeless.
And that’s another incredible realization.The picture doesn’t feel anywhere near as
dated as it should.Aside from some of
the obvious stuff like clothing and an old computer it all looks great.I mean take the opening for example.You could very easily do that scene today as
is.All you would need to do is swap out
the tube TV for a flatscreen and the landline phone for a cell phone.And that’s just what they did in the 2022 Scream!
Funny enough Wes Craven kicked off the 90’s slasher revival
and spawned a slew of imitators same as Halloween did in the late
70’s/early 80’s. And similarly pretty
much all the rip offs fell by the wayside because they were derivative junk. No others from the time period are remembered
as fondly as Scream.
Going into this one I was worried my memory of it from over
twenty five years ago would be totally inaccurate and maybe the opening would
be cool but the rest wouldn’t hold up.I’m so glad to report this really is a true classic.Wes Craven did it again.He made his mark with the, let’s say quirky, Last
House on the Left, put a brand new imaginative spin on slashers with A
Nightmare on Elm Street and then had one last trick up his sleeve with the
quasi-meta Scream.I have to
credit Williamson’s script with being very well written but Craven’s execution
is top notch.It’s amazing how energetic
and youthful the production feels while guided with the confidence of a long
time vet of the genre.It’s Craven’s Frenzy.
Look, I know I've been slacking off the past year or so with posting stuff to this here blob but Harefooted Halloween (patent pending) will go on as normal in October. That's sixteen or so reviews in thirty one days with the usual mix of a couple of well established franchises and other random stuff I happen to come across. Hopefully we'll discover some new gems. Alright, see you in a few.
Just wanna do a quick recommend on The Beast of War
aka The Beast. It’s set in the
early 80’s during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. The opening shows the appalling destruction
of a small Afghan village in the desert by a couple of Russian tanks leaving
only rubble, corpses and orphaned babies behind. Kinda hard to watch. After the blitz one tank takes the wrong path
on their way to the next target and gets lost.
Their radio got busted in the previous attack and their map got
partially burned so they can’t call for help or figure out where they are. The survivors of the decimated village get
word that the tank has broken off from their group and is essentially trapped
in the middle of nowhere. They decide to
take advantage of the situation to seek revenge. The story plays out like a cat and mouse game
with the Soviets hopelessly marching on while doing battle with the Afghans
every so often.
It's a wonderful and inventive setup that’s based on a play
by William Mastrosimone (With Honors) which makes sense.It’s an ensemble performance about the
horrors of war, mania, redemption, honor, forgiveness, rage, etc.This sort of story seems timeless and I’m
sure just about every culture has an ancient tale that’s similar to it.You could easily have this set in any time
period, any location and with any two foes from any background fighting each
other.
And while all the battle scenes are well staged and the
effects are good and the production design is awesome and the cinematography is
stunning (Douglas Milsome (Full Metal Jacket, Breakdown)) the
centerpiece is definitely the performances which are all really impressive.Of course the one that slaps you in the face
the hardest is George Dzundza (Species II, No Mercy) as the tank
commander.He’s a ruthless fuck who
doesn’t give a shit about anything but his tank.Worse than that though is he has a Queeg
thing going on from The Caine Mutiny where he sees conspiracy against
him everywhere.So you never know when
he’ll turn on you and attempt murder.Dzundza
plays up the delusion and absolute confidence in his authority perfectly.He darts these crazy shifty eyes all over the
place waiting, even daring for someone to defy him.He truly is a scary sonuvabitch.
However, the most interesting set of characters are the
leader of the Afghan tribe, Taj played by Steven Bauer (Traffic, Gleaming
the Cube), and the Soviet tank driver and mechanic Koverchenko played by
Jason Patric (Rush, Narc).Taj
becomes Khan after his father and brother are killed in the attack on his
village from the opening and he struggles with that.It’s not how he wanted to inherit that
prestigious position.At first he tries
to forcibly assert his authority with poor results but then over the course of
the revenge mission he grows and learns how to handle his men and when to show
mercy or implement violence.
On the flipside Koverchenko realizes he’s caught between a
rock and hard place.He knows that if he
doesn’t carry out his superior’s orders, like needlessly running over an
incapacitated man with the tank, he’ll get shot.He’s not necessarily the best soldier because
he thinks too much for himself instead of mindlessly following his
commander.He also tries to learn a
little about the Afghani culture from an interpreter/soldier/Afghan communist
in his squad.His continued bickering
with his commander escalates until finally the unit ties him to a rock, rests a
grenade behind his head and leaves him for dead.The Afghans find him and decide to take him
prisoner instead of dispatching him on the spot.Koverchenko is pissed so when the Afghans
offer him the chance to join their venture to destroy the tank he takes it.
This relationship between Taj and Koverchenko is complex and
beautiful.They don’t know each other’s
language, have different customs, values and motives yet they join forces and
bond over this one objective to make the soldiers in that fuckin’ tank
pay.Is the enemy of your enemy your
friend?Or do you still hold a grudge
because their past is irreconcilable?Taj makes a ballsy move at the risk of losing his men’s respect by
reaching out to Koverchenko for help.His expertise and insider knowledge would be exceptionally valuable for
the mission.Neither man ever thought
they’d be in this incredibly awkward and delicate situation which makes it all
the more touching when they form an uneasy alliance.
Bauer and Patric are really great together and give
passionate performances.You can see the
body language change as they slowly start trusting each other.Patric puts on his trademark tough
individualistic attitude ardent about his beliefs and Bauer displays his
trademark big brother-like warm inviting demeanor.Watching them play off one another is
fantastic.
The trickiest aspect of the film is how it messes with your
emotions about Koverchenko.At first
he’s a monster because he’s part of a crew that mercilessly destroys people’s
lives.Then he turns on his own squad so
you want to root for him.Taj doesn’t
know how to feel either by asking “are you a devil or an angel?”And I guess the answer is he’s both.It’s complicated.It depends on who you ask, when you ask and
what your objectives are.And I love
that the film lets you decide for yourself where you stand.
So check this one out.It’s Kevin Reynolds’ (The Count of Monte Cristo, Waterworld) best
picture which…may…not be the best way to sell it.Look, it’s a fantastic movie that I wasn’t
expecting much out of and ended up really digging.