What I Liked:
Even though the setup and execution is mostly conventional it has a different
feel partly due to the very long action scene in the middle with Leatherface
chasing the kids around. They changed
the Texas Chainsaw formula enough to
freshen things up which was welcomed. We
haven’t had a truly different type of installment since number 2 back in 1986.
The filmmakers sneakily make you sympathize with Leatherface
and doggonit I fell for it. This is a
minor spoiler but I wanted to mention it because it may get you to see the
movie and come on, who couldn’t use more Chainsaw
in their life?
After Leatherface slices a tire on the kids’ van as they’re peeling
away there’s an awesome shot of him picking up his chainsaw and watching the
van careen down the road and flip over in the distance. These films never go for more reserved shots
like that where you see something play out uncut so this was a pleasant surprise.
What I Didn’t Like:
The story makes no goddamn sense whatsoever and is pretty stupid. A twenty something (Alexandra Daddario (Bereavement)) inherits from her late
grandmother a huge house along with everything in it. The only catch is there’s a Leatherface
living in the basement. He’s a relative
of the grandmother and she’s been secretly taking care of him. When the inheritor and her friends show up
Leatherface tries to kill everyone not realizing the new girl is also family. That’s quite a different (and bad) premise
for a Chainsaw.
It’s never a good idea to have “3D” in your title.
Overall Impressions:
This one’s supposed to be a direct sequel to the original 1974 film and not
part of the 2003 remake franchise. The
movie starts with the sheriff and his posse confronting the fucked up family
right after Sally escapes to freedom.
The mob kills the family and burns the house down except Leatherface
mysteriously disappears in the confusion.
You probably didn’t need to go all the way back to the first
picture to setup a film where Leatherface goes solo. And Leatherface on his own without weirdo
family members surrounding him is really the main idea here. It’s strange that it took thirty nine years
for this happen considering he’s pretty much the only thing most people
remember from the Chainsaw series. I mean I’m glad someone tried it once because
I think it’s a worthwhile experiment. But
in the end Leatherface doesn’t work great just by himself. You kinda need the whole bizarre family to
help round out the experience and give more variety to the horror.
But the big question the filmmakers had to tackle was how do
you get Leatherface alone? He can’t take
care of himself and he’s not supernatural like Michael Myers or Jason Voorhees. He needs a caretaker but they can’t actually
be in the picture because that would defeat the purpose. So the best the filmmakers could come up with
was the inheritance angle. It’s weak as
shit but I guess it maybe sorta works if only to achieve the goal of isolating
the character for this one movie.
On another note I remember when this came out the semi-big
deal was that we were gonna get to see Leatherface going on a rampage in
public. He shows up at a carnival,
wreaks havoc and even throws his chainsaw at someone. All of that is fun but not nearly as crazy as
the trailers and commercials would have you believe. It isn’t like Leatherface is gutting people
left and right. Everyone scatters when
he shows up and he’s after one particular person so he’s focused.
Oh and did anyone else notice the pig masked person in a
black robe at the carnival? You know
like from the Saw movies? What the hell was that all about? It’s clearly intentional but I’m not sure
what the connection is.
The concepts in Texas
Chainsaw 3D had to be done. Let’s
see how well Leatherface does by his lonesome and let’s see if they can get the
audience on his side. The film is kinda
interesting in that sense but it turns out Leatherface can’t really carry a
movie by himself. I wouldn’t recommend
it unless you’re curious to see what a family free Chainsaw installment is like.
No comments:
Post a Comment