What I Liked: What a nice simple little vampire tale that’s based on an 1839 Tolstoy novella. A French marquis gets robbed on his travels in eastern Europe so he’s told to go to the Gorcha house where they’ll supply him with food, shelter and a horse to continue on his way. When he gets to the tiny estate he’s greeted hospitably but the family’s in the middle of a crisis. Turks have attacked the surrounding area so the patriarch went out to hunt them down for revenge. He tells them if he doesn’t return in six days then he’s become a vourdalak, or vampire (not sure how that works but ok). And yep, that’s what happens. Some members of the family believe he’s completely fine but others think he’s definitely a vampire. While the family deals with this emergency a horse for the marquis will have to wait leaving him stuck in a sticky situation. Vampire shit ensues.
On the technical side they knock it out of the park. The movie is beautifully shot (on film too) with
foggy woods, candlelit interiors, a mostly locked down camera and carefully
chosen angles to accentuate the puppet’s features (you read that right, we’ll
get there) and hide its operators. The
production and costume design also wonderfully immerses you in the late
eighteenth/early nineteenth century. The
marquis’ look is the most striking with his almost neon blue coat, powder white
face, red hair and red lips. It
contrasts nicely with the Gorcha family’s modest all tan and brown
outfits. The entire picture takes place
in the eerie stony Gorcha house and surrounding forest and it all feels
appropriately cold, uninviting and with little comforts. Lastly I want to shout out the period
suitable harpsichord soundtrack as well.
It lends effectively to the unsettling atmosphere.
Alright let’s address the dummy in the room. If you’ve heard of this film the one thing
you probably know is that the Gorcha father, the vourdalak, is played by a
human sized puppet. Does it work? I’m split on it. On one hand the filmmakers were able to
essentially have a corpse star in the lead role with its skeletal structure, hairless
body, sickly gray blue complexion, sunken eyes and lipless mouth with
protruding teeth. The thing looks
undeniably cool. On the other hand…
What I Didn’t Like: …its movements are janky as heck,
the mouth can’t do anything more than open and shut so talking looks silly and
it has a smooth texture all over with no pieces of flesh, hair, veins or
anything else you might find on an undead creature. My point is I never forgot I wasn’t looking
at a goddamn puppet. The character is
played seriously though with no hint at satire which I appreciate. According to director/writer/puppet maker
Adrien Beau the decision to use a puppet was made early on. Budget constraints and a desire to use
practical effects are the reasons given.
Hey, you gotta do what you gotta do.
And sure, a puppet as your main villain is a kind of selling point. It’s different. I would say this decision is more quirky than
anything else. They don’t do anything
unique with the puppet that would be impossible otherwise which is perhaps a
missed opportunity. A regular human
actor in the role probably would’ve kept you engaged in the story more, but
would it be as memorable? I dunno. This is a personal preference situation. You’ll have to watch it for yourself and see
how you feel.
Overall Impressions: I dig this one. It may not be the best vampire picture but
the straightforward story and impressive technical achievements make for a
pleasant outing. I would love to see
what Adrien Beau does next because this is a very promising start.
No comments:
Post a Comment