One question at the top though, how did Ghostface come to be
called Ghostface? In the first and
second films the Halloween costume the killers use is labeled Father Death on
the package. It’s curious that this name
wasn’t adopted by the fans, although Ghostface does sound cooler. Well according to the internet Rose McGowan
in the first film uses the term Ghostface and I guess it stuck with the
community because as far back as I can remember this is what anyone has ever
called this character. There’s a loose
The Shape/Michael Myers connection here with the villain having multiple names
and the fans choosing for the world which prevails.
Ok, a very silly trademark of the series is Ghostface’s
pratfalls. When he takes a spill look
out, he goes flying. And don’t be
fooled, this is the movie laughing AT the character and I don’t care for it
that much. I wish the stumbles weren’t
so cartoonish and happen so often. You
could argue this makes sense because it’s hard to see in the mask and your
mobility is somewhat limited in the full costume and I buy that to an extent. If he gets tripped up for a moment that’s ok
but having him go airborne and land on his ass almost every time is too much.
And this leads to another aspect that I kinda scratch my
head over which is the insistence that these films are part comedy. Part 3 is perhaps the closest but overall this
sentiment doesn’t exactly come across. It’s
probably all the meta stuff they’re referring to but not all of it lands. Plus the way these are shot and edited
doesn’t imply setup, joke, setup, joke.
It’s presented straight up like you would expect. In the end there isn’t that much more comic
relief than your normal horror picture.
So I always thought it was weird when the filmmakers talk about the
series like it’s a yuck a minute with intermittent deadly serious slayings.
Ghostface is played by someone different (or multiple
people) in every movie making him fairly unique in the slasher realm. He’s not a supernatural entity like Jason or
Freddy and he’s not supposed to be the same person like Michael Myers and he’s
not a possessed creature like Chucky.
He’s a new guy in the costume each time out. Of course this poses a problem because it
seems every other person Sidney comes across is utterly insane with an
unquenchable bloodlust.
In each episode it’s revealed at the end that there are two
killers working together to terrorize their victims. The only time they diverge from this is in 3
where one guy flies solo. The novelty of
a dastardly duo is refreshing the first time but gets tiresome quickly. They should’ve played with this more instead
of almost always sticking with a pair of slayers.
Moving on, the first film has a rich backstory that’s hinted
at and explored somewhat in the first sequel.
Syndey’s mother was murdered by someone who’s sitting on death row due
to Sidney’s eye witness testimony. Turns
out it wasn’t him. I’m not saying I need
that movie but well, that’s a movie. To
go that far with a character’s past is impressive and usually relegated to
personal notes between the actor and director.
This easily could’ve been left out because it’s not crucial to the
motive of the killers. Billy Loomis is
angry because Sidney’s mom caused his parents marriage to break up so he kills
her (offscreen). Fine. But having a third party erroneously take the
fall for her murder isn’t necessary. It
could be an unsolved case and Sidney could still be pissed at Gale over how she
covered the story. Anyway, I love that
they went the extra mile to officially make it a part of Sidney’s DNA. A lesser film would’ve balked at the idea.
Speaking of Sidney, man, she has some of the worst goddamn
luck in the world. Killers keep finding
her. Over five movies she faces no less
than nine multiple murdering psychopaths which is like kind of a lot (two of
them are blood relatives of Sidney no less).
I guess this is her plight for fingering the wrong guy who she thought
murdered her mother? She must endure a
lifetime of numerous maniacs who want to turn her life into a living hell and
her body into Swiss cheese? Sure that’s
a bad thing that happened but it wasn’t malicious, it was a mistake. Damn.
Perhaps the only other person who gets it worse is
Dewey. This sonuvabitch gets stabbed
badly in 1 causing nerve damage and then gets stabbed again in 2 in an even
more brutal fashion. Then in 3 he gets
sliced in the arm and the crap beat out of him by Ghostface including various
blows to the head and a tumble down the stairs.
In 4 he takes the least amount of damage but still gets knocked around
with a nasty metal bedpan hit to the skull.
Additionally there’s the emotional turmoil he has to deal with in each
installment over his love/hate relationship with Gale. Mercifully in 5 Ghostface finally guts this
fucker and boots him out of the franchise for good. Jeez.
Weirdly as the narrative continues to unfold across the
films it only gets less interesting despite some Saw level plot reveal zaniness
(not counting the TV show which has its own universe of whacked out bends in
the path). Here’s my vote for the two
craziest twists. One is the introduction
of Sidney’s long lost brother in 3 who Maureen got pregnant with during a
search for stardom in Hollywood in the 70’s (it’s unclear if she was raped or
not). And, hold on to your hats, turns
out this asshole nutjob sibling orchestrated the events of the first film from
behind the scenes. Sheeeeit. Smash cut to eleven years later in 4 and
Sidney’s niece is a fuckin’ lunatic with a grand plan of taking over the
spotlight from Sidney by killing her and pretending to be the lone survivor of
a new round of murders. The two end up
hashing it out in the ICU while recovering from life threatening injuries. Sidney uses a defibrillator to zap her
opponent’s head as a stopgap then shoots her in the chest. I know you’re thinking these turns sound
amazing but the repetitive tediousness of the other ninety five percent of the runtime
makes me not care by the time we hit the finale.
Watching all the Screams in a row like this was eye
opening. Sadly my ultimate takeaway is this
is kind of a shitty franchise honestly. The
original has earned its masterpiece status for sure. I don’t think anyone’s gonna argue with
that. Those sequels though, woof. None of them are very good which makes me
think the whole thing has been coasting on the genius, success and now
nostalgia of that first one. Other
horror franchises get flack for being the same thing over and over but at least
the Fridays, Nightmares, Halloweens, Chainsaws and the like have either awesome
visual style, vivid characters, unusual intriguing stories, supernatural
elements, incredible effects work, kick ass production design or hugely
entertaining performances. It’s
difficult to create a continuing saga for the Screams because the
sequels don’t contain any of that. They’re
totally straight forward horror whodunit pictures that take place in the real
world with a sorta goofy Scooby Doo quality to them when the killer finally
takes off the mask to unveil him/herself.
I think the sequels would’ve worked better if they were episodic and
involved a different set of characters with a new backstory and scenario each
time. But guess what? They kinda did that.
But Scream’s legacy is long and remains firmly in the
cinematic realm for its core audience. It’s
touched a lot of people at this point and (somewhat puzzlingly) has cemented
itself as a titan among horror franchises.
There’s more to come too and unfortunately shows no signs of peeling off
the mask, putting down the knife and becoming an actual ghost. It makes me wanna yell loudly in a shrieking manner.
No comments:
Post a Comment